<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Instructional Design on Coach Alan</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/tags/instructional-design/</link><description>Recent content in Instructional Design on Coach Alan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:45:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://alanpruitt.com/tags/instructional-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Essay 36: What If I Didn't Standardize the Loop?</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-36/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:45:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-36/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the architectural evolution of &lt;strong&gt;Curriculum-as-Code (CaC)&lt;/strong&gt; across our higher education courses and clinical exercise science programs, few frameworks have proven as foundational as the &lt;strong&gt;Mission Loop (Pattern / Rule / Solve)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;By demanding that every learning challenge follow an explicit three-phase pipeline—observing empirical telemetry, confronting it with non-negotiable Single Source of Truth (SSoT) constraints, and deriving a human-verified solution—we insulated our classrooms from generative AI hallucination and restored the cognitive friction of authentic deduction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Logic Grid: Why Good Assessment Looks Like Sudoku (and How the Mission Loop Solves the AI Crisis)</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-30-the-logic-grid/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-30-the-logic-grid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conversation surrounding generative artificial intelligence in higher education has fixated on the wrong villain.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We wring our hands over language models because they can instantly generate a cohesive, grammatically pristine 500-word essay on physical inactivity or socioeconomic barriers to healthcare. In response, institutions have spent millions on probabilistic detection software that flags innocent non-native English speakers while failing to detect basic prompt injections.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The crisis is not that the machine can write. The crisis is that our assignments were built to reward surface-level fluency rather than analytical deduction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essay 31: Beyond the Slide Deck — Architecture as Professional Development</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-31-beyond-the-slide-deck/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-31-beyond-the-slide-deck/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have sat through enough institutional professional development sessions to know the script by heart: sixty generic slides, high-altitude platitudes about the changing nature of work, a five-minute demonstration of a commercial chatbot, and a polite Q&amp;amp;A. The moment faculty step out of the seminar room and back to their department desks, that ephemeral deck evaporates in the face of a forty-hour grading backlog, committee notes, and syllabus revisions.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Worse, most of these training decks and post-session web portals actively violate basic digital accessibility standards. At a time when the Department of Justice&amp;rsquo;s final rule on ADA Title II digital accessibility demands strict, verifiable conformance, institutions routinely disseminate training materials that rely on uncaptioned visuals, illegible color contrast, and fragmented PDF exports.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Curriculum-as-Code, ADA Title II Compliance, and Fleet-Wide Accessibility Refactoring</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-27/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 16:53:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-27/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When the Department of Justice codified WCAG 2.1 AA standards under ADA Title II for public higher education institutions, it ended the era of reactive, page-by-page accessibility audits. Traditional post-publication fixes inside LMS rich text editors fail to scale across multi-section course fleets.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Achieving sustainable compliance requires moving accessibility upstream into a version-controlled engineering workflow: &lt;strong&gt;Curriculum-as-Code&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;hr&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-upstream-accessibility-pipeline"&gt;The Upstream Accessibility Pipeline&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;By authoring instructional materials in standardized Markdown and validating them through automated linting pipelines before deployment, entire categories of accessibility errors are eliminated at the source.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>