<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pedagogy on Coach Alan</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/categories/pedagogy/</link><description>Recent content in Pedagogy on Coach Alan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://alanpruitt.com/categories/pedagogy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Logic Grid: Why Good Assessment Looks Like Sudoku (and How the Mission Loop Solves the AI Crisis)</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-30-the-logic-grid/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-30-the-logic-grid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conversation surrounding generative artificial intelligence in higher education has fixated on the wrong villain.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We wring our hands over language models because they can instantly generate a cohesive, grammatically pristine 500-word essay on physical inactivity or socioeconomic barriers to healthcare. In response, institutions have spent millions on probabilistic detection software that flags innocent non-native English speakers while failing to detect basic prompt injections.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The crisis is not that the machine can write. The crisis is that our assignments were built to reward surface-level fluency rather than analytical deduction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>