<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Curriculum-as-Code on Coach Alan</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/categories/curriculum-as-code/</link><description>Recent content in Curriculum-as-Code on Coach Alan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://alanpruitt.com/categories/curriculum-as-code/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Logic Grid: Why Good Assessment Looks Like Sudoku (and How the Mission Loop Solves the AI Crisis)</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-30-the-logic-grid/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-30-the-logic-grid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conversation surrounding generative artificial intelligence in higher education has fixated on the wrong villain.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We wring our hands over language models because they can instantly generate a cohesive, grammatically pristine 500-word essay on physical inactivity or socioeconomic barriers to healthcare. In response, institutions have spent millions on probabilistic detection software that flags innocent non-native English speakers while failing to detect basic prompt injections.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The crisis is not that the machine can write. The crisis is that our assignments were built to reward surface-level fluency rather than analytical deduction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essay 31: Beyond the Slide Deck — Architecture as Professional Development</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-31-beyond-the-slide-deck/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-31-beyond-the-slide-deck/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have sat through enough institutional professional development sessions to know the script by heart: sixty generic slides, high-altitude platitudes about the changing nature of work, a five-minute demonstration of a commercial chatbot, and a polite Q&amp;amp;A. The moment faculty step out of the seminar room and back to their department desks, that ephemeral deck evaporates in the face of a forty-hour grading backlog, committee notes, and syllabus revisions.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Worse, most of these training decks and post-session web portals actively violate basic digital accessibility standards. At a time when the Department of Justice&amp;rsquo;s final rule on ADA Title II digital accessibility demands strict, verifiable conformance, institutions routinely disseminate training materials that rely on uncaptioned visuals, illegible color contrast, and fragmented PDF exports.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essay 29: The Upstream Shift — Why Post-Production Accessibility Is a Failure of Architectural Design</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-29/</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:30:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-29/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-downstream-trap-of-higher-education-it"&gt;The Downstream Trap of Higher Education IT&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;For decades, higher education’s operational model for digital accessibility has mirrored a broken assembly line: build the course however you like, launch it into the Learning Management System (LMS) at the start of the semester, wait for an accommodation request or a compliance audit, and then scramble to patch the defects downstream.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;As public institutions face the rigorous enforcement timeline of the Department of Justice’s &lt;strong&gt;ADA Title II Final Rule (28 CFR Part 35)&lt;/strong&gt;, this downstream mentality has become an institutional liability.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essay 28: Beyond Performative Compliance — ADA Title II, Living Conformance Statements, and Automated Institutional Governance</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-28/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-28/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-legal-fiction-of-the-static-disclaimer"&gt;The Legal Fiction of the Static Disclaimer&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;For two decades, higher education treated digital accessibility as an administrative footnote. Institutions copied boilerplate statements into site footers, created generic accommodation request forms, and assumed that good-faith intent shielded them from regulatory liability.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The Department of Justice’s &lt;strong&gt;ADA Title II Final Rule (28 CFR Part 35)&lt;/strong&gt; ended that era.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;By establishing &lt;strong&gt;WCAG 2.2 Level AA&lt;/strong&gt; as the unambiguous federal technical standard for state and local government entities—including public community colleges and state universities—the mandate removed the shield of administrative ambiguity. When the compliance clock expires, an inaccessible course shell, an untagged PDF syllabus, or an unannounced dynamic widget is not a minor pedagogical friction; it is a federal civil rights non-conformance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essay 25: The Accessibility Checker Parity Illusion: Schema Divergence &amp; CaC</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-25/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 08:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/essay-25/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-illusion-of-the-green-checkmark"&gt;The Illusion of the Green Checkmark&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In modern higher education IT, institutions invest heavily in automated Learning Management System (LMS) accessibility checkers. These tools present faculty and administrators with simplified dashboards, color-coded dials, and green checkmarks indicating high compliance scores.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;This is the &lt;strong&gt;Accessibility Checker Parity Illusion&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A passing score on a native LMS scanner frequently masks fundamental non-conformance with &lt;strong&gt;WCAG 2.2 Level AA&lt;/strong&gt; and federal &lt;strong&gt;ADA Title II (28 CFR Part 35)&lt;/strong&gt; mandates. The failure stems not from malicious intent, but from &lt;strong&gt;schema divergence&lt;/strong&gt;—the structural gap between the underlying DOM rendered by the browser and the limited AST parsed by the LMS plugin.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evidence-Based Nutrition vs. The Feed: Upstream SSoT Governance in Sports Nutrition</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/21-evidence-based-nutrition-vs-feed/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/21-evidence-based-nutrition-vs-feed/</guid><description>How EXW150 uses Curriculum-as-Code, the Mission Loop framework, and federal SSoT standards to insulate community college students from social media fad diets, predatory supplement claims, and unanchored AI nutrition advice.</description></item><item><title>Foundational Human Movement in the Algorithmic Age: PAGA 2018 SSoT &amp; Community Inactivity Interventions</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/22-foundational-human-movement-in-the-algorithmic-age/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/22-foundational-human-movement-in-the-algorithmic-age/</guid><description>How EXW101 deploys Curriculum-as-Code, the federal PAGA 2018 SSoT, and the Mission Loop framework to deconstruct systemic inactivity patterns and build community-level health interventions in rural borderland regions.</description></item><item><title>Essay 24</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/24-chatbots-canvas-lms-cautionary-tale/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/24-chatbots-canvas-lms-cautionary-tale/</guid><description>Why integrating commercial AI chatbots inside Canvas LMS introduces severe institutional risks, compromises FERPA/ADA standards, and how high-friction Socratic assessments preserve human voice and presence.</description></item><item><title>The Mission Loop Architecture: Pattern, Rule, and Solve in Coded Instruction</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/12-mission-loop-architecture/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/12-mission-loop-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;!-- =========================================================================&#10; LANG: ENGLISH&#10; ========================================================================= --&gt;&#10;&lt;div data-lang="en"&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-mission-loop-architecture-pattern-rule-and-solve-in-coded-instruction"&gt;The Mission Loop Architecture: Pattern, Rule, and Solve in Coded Instruction&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In traditional health science education, assignment prompts often ask open-ended questions like &amp;ldquo;Describe how you would design an exercise program for a diabetic client.&amp;rdquo; While well-intentioned, these unconstrained assignments invite vague responses, obscure student reasoning errors, and make objective assessment extraordinarily difficult.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;When curriculum is engineered as code, learning tasks require a structured, deterministic execution pipeline: &lt;strong&gt;The Mission Loop&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Two-Part Scaffold Framework: Bridging Simulation &amp; Research-Grade Application</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/11-two-part-scaffold-framework/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/11-two-part-scaffold-framework/</guid><description>&lt;!-- =========================================================================&#10; LANG: ENGLISH&#10; ========================================================================= --&gt;&#10;&lt;div data-lang="en"&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-two-part-scaffold-framework-bridging-simulation--research-grade-application"&gt;The Two-Part Scaffold Framework: Bridging Simulation &amp;amp; Research-Grade Application&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Laboratory education in applied kinesiology faces a persistent operational dilemma: virtual simulations often lack hands-on physiological tactile feedback, while purely physical labs risk wasting valuable equipment time on basic mathematical or procedural misunderstandings.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;When curriculum is engineered as code, hybrid laboratory design solves this friction through a deterministic &lt;strong&gt;Two-Part Scaffold Framework&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="1-the-architecture-of-the-two-part-scaffold"&gt;1. The Architecture of the Two-Part Scaffold&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The scaffold divides weekly laboratory modules into two distinct, sequential phases: &lt;strong&gt;Part A (Digital Guided Learning &amp;amp; Simulation)&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Part B (Research-Grade Practical Application)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Vibe-Coding Paradigm: Speed, Intuition, and Full-Stack Execution in Instructional Engineering</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/13-vibe-coding-paradigm/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/13-vibe-coding-paradigm/</guid><description>&lt;!-- =========================================================================&#10; LANG: ENGLISH&#10; ========================================================================= --&gt;&#10;&lt;div data-lang="en"&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-vibe-coding-paradigm-speed-intuition-and-full-stack-execution-in-instructional-engineering"&gt;The Vibe-Coding Paradigm: Speed, Intuition, and Full-Stack Execution in Instructional Engineering&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;For decades, building custom educational software or interactive lab tools required navigating a massive barrier to entry: armies of full-stack developers, months of sprint cycles, and rigid proprietary frameworks. If an educator wanted an interactive molecular flavor workbench or an agentic PWA for clinical exercise testing, they were forced to submit feature requests to software vendors and wait years for bloated, one-size-fits-all releases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Integration for Pedagogy: Writing Automated Unit Tests for Learning Outcomes</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/07-continuous-integration-pedagogy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/07-continuous-integration-pedagogy/</guid><description>&lt;!-- =========================================================================&#10; LANG: ENGLISH&#10; ========================================================================= --&gt;&#10;&lt;div data-lang="en"&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="continuous-integration-for-pedagogy-writing-automated-unit-tests-for-learning-outcomes"&gt;Continuous Integration for Pedagogy: Writing Automated Unit Tests for Learning Outcomes&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In software engineering, continuous integration (CI) pipelines run automated test suites on every commit to ensure system contracts remain unbroken. In traditional instructional design, however, curriculum changes are committed without automated verification—resulting in broken prerequisites, unmapped learning outcomes, and silent accessibility regressions that go unnoticed until students encounter them.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Continuous Integration for Pedagogy&lt;/strong&gt; shifts quality assurance from a manual pre-semester review to an automated background process running on every Git commit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Practical AI in Canvas: Supporting Course Design, Content Creation, and Student Engagement</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/06-canvas-ai-course-design/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/06-canvas-ai-course-design/</guid><description>&lt;!-- =========================================================================&#10; LANG: ENGLISH&#10; ========================================================================= --&gt;&#10;&lt;div data-lang="en"&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="practical-ai-in-canvas-supporting-course-design-content-creation-and-student-engagement"&gt;Practical AI in Canvas: Supporting Course Design, Content Creation, and Student Engagement&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Artificial intelligence is no longer a peripheral experiment in higher education—it is an embedded operational capability within modern Learning Management Systems. As Canvas continues to integrate native AI features, instructors face the practical challenge of moving past theoretical hype toward actionable, ethically grounded course implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Drawing on recent higher education conference developments, this specification provides concrete strategies for leveraging AI inside Canvas to streamline content creation, elevate student engagement, and maintain rigorous human-in-the-loop oversight.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Curriculum-as-Code: Treating Educational Content Like Software Development</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/02-curriculum-as-code/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/02-curriculum-as-code/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="curriculum-as-code-treating-educational-content-like-software-development"&gt;Curriculum-as-Code: Treating Educational Content Like Software Development&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Why proprietary LMS platforms fail modern compliance and how Git version control, Markdown SSoT, and CI/CD validation redefine instructional engineering.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Instructional Engineering: Transforming Curriculum into Version-Controlled Source Code</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/05-instructional-engineering/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/05-instructional-engineering/</guid><description>&lt;!-- =========================================================================&#10; LANG: ENGLISH&#10; ========================================================================= --&gt;&#10;&lt;div data-lang="en"&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="instructional-engineering-transforming-curriculum-into-version-controlled-source-code"&gt;Instructional Engineering: Transforming Curriculum into Version-Controlled Source Code&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;For decades, instructional design has treated educational content as static documents trapped inside proprietary Learning Management Systems or binary PDFs. &lt;strong&gt;Instructional Engineering&lt;/strong&gt; replaces this reactive model with software design principles: modularity, automated linting, plain-text portability, and continuous delivery.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-shift-from-design-to-engineering"&gt;The Shift from Design to Engineering&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Traditional instructional design focuses heavily on visual presentation within specific tools. Instructional Engineering treats content as an evolving software system that must meet strict operational criteria:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shifting from AI Fear to Strategic Assessment Design</title><link>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/01-ai-assessment-design/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alanpruitt.com/essays/01-ai-assessment-design/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="shifting-from-ai-fear-to-strategic-assessment-design"&gt;Shifting from AI Fear to Strategic Assessment Design&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;How Curriculum-as-Code paradigms transform educators from passive task checkers into problem architects by auditing the cognitive process rather than standard answers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>